they also loved and inseminated the daughters of such monsters, engendering
humanity from the semi-bestial apish creatures that then peopled the earth.
These Fallen Angels are no
other than the Atlantean Sons of God, the Civilizing Heroes that we encounter
in essentially all mythologies of the ancient nations, both in the Old
and in the New World. Why would our forefathers invent such a myth and
build their religions around them if they were just a lie, an invention
of some sort? Saviors such as Christ, Mani, Buddha and Krishna among others,
are deemed real, historical personages.
The Saviors of all religions
are indeed replicas, real or not, of the Heroes of old, they too Sons of
God by a mortal, and combining both natures, like Christ and Krishna. When
we go back in time, this endless succession of Saviours ultimately end
in Flood heroes such as Manu and Noah, the very ones who founded the present
era. And the Flood is indeed no other thing than the cataclysm that foundered
Atlantis, in the dawn of times. Hence, we see that, in fact, the Civilizing
Heroes are personifications of the
Missae (or Messias), the Celestial
Messengers that came out from Atlantis, that is, from the sunken Paradise
turned into the Land of the Dead of the ancient traditions.
The Island of Fire and the Island
of the Sun
The Civilizing Heroes of
both the Old and the New World were the luciferine Dravidas of South India,
Burma and pristine Indonesia, the true site of Eden. As we said above,
the "indigenism" of the Amerindians was, like their "savagery" and their
incorrigible "irreligion", merely a contrivance of the Whites in order
to justify the genocide of their elder brothers of America, whose land
and wealth they burningly coveted. These pristine Dravidas were the Atlantean
"Reds", called by precisely that epithet in nearly all traditions.
Eden, the Terrestrial Paradise,
was indeed Indonesia and, more exactly, the sunken portion of it which
we identify with Lemurian Atlantis. In fact, Indonesia is precisely the
"Island of Fire" that is associated with Atlantis in the ancient Gnostic
traditions. Indonesia derives its name from the Greek
meaning "Indian island". But the word "India" derives, like the name of
Eden, from a Sanskrit radix
So, the true etym (or etymon or etymology) of the
name of Indonesia is "Island of Fire", as we just said. But the above radix
is also associated with the idea of "sun" (Drav.
so that "Indonesia" is also the "Island of the Sun", another frequent name
of Atlantis in esoteric traditions. Eden, the Terrestrial Paradise, was
indeed the Lemurian Atlantis that was the Great Mother of gods and men.
Her wonderful "Son" (or "Twin" or "Lover") was the second Paradise, the
Indian Atlantis, built in the Indus
The Meaning of the Navajo Sandpaintings
We finally reach a position
where we can usefully interpret the Navajo sandpaintings. This sophisticated
form of artistic expression they learnt from the Pueblo Indians, along
with the arts and techniques, as we detailed above.
We hope that, by now, the
dear reader who followed us patiently up to here, is at least half convinced
that the Amerindian myths and religions are essentially the same as those
of the Old World, particularly insofar as the esoteric message is concerned.
And, if he bears with us to the end of the present chapter he will, we
are sure, be as fully convinced as we were ourselves when we first discovered
the true meaning of Hindu and Amerindian mythology and their intimate connection
with the secret history of Atlantis.
Of course, the underlying
meaning of the Amerindian myths is very difficult to penetrate. It is perhaps
even more difficult than their Old World mythical counterparts. After all,
the Amerindian myths are, like the ones of the Old World, part of the secret
of the Mysteries. So, if they were easy to pierce, they would be no Mysteries,
and would require no Initiation at all.
But, even without fully understanding
the inner meaning of the ancient myths and religious traditions, it is
readily apparent that they all derive from a single, unique source of diffusion.
The agreement in form, in detail and in significance transcends all possibility
of a random coincidence. And the forms are so sophisticate, so close in
all details, and so transcendental as to preclude all sorts of collective
archetypes possibly engraved in the human unconscious, in the way proposed
by Jung and Eliade and, a little bit less fancifully, by Freud and his